Auto Workers' Temple Ass'n v. Janson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bird, J,
Plaintiff is an incorporated company, its chief object being to promote the interests of those engaged in the automobile industry. Defendant Hans Janson is by trade an automobile trimmer. He was an active member of the plaintiff organization. Defendant Fred Weiss is a real estate operator in the city of Detroit.
Plaintiff association concluded to erect a temple in Detroit for the use of its members, and in pursuance of that conclusion appointed a committee of five members to select a location for that purpose. Defendant Janson was appointed a member of that committee. He became the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bush v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Wilson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Scofield v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Salliotte v. DollarhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Moore v. MeadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fenestra Inc. v. Gulf American Land Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Roche v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Krum v. SheppardDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1966
- Dunn v. Goebel Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. FurkasMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.