Legal Opinion

David L. Hansford v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 29, 1965No. 19436PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order

2Per curiam

On consideration of appellant’s motion to set bail pending appeal, of appellee’s opposition thereto, and of appellee’s motion for leave to file supplement to opposition to bail pending appeal, and it appearing that appellee has lodged with the clerk its supplement to the opposition to bail pending appeal, it is

Ordered by the court that the aforesaid motion for leave to file supplement to opposition be granted, and the clerk is directed to file appellee’s supplement to opposition to bail pending appeal herein, and on consideration whereof, it is

Further Ordered by the court that…

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony Provenzano, in No. 79-1912, and Thomas Andretta, in No. 79-1913Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Thomas E. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Bobby Russell v. United States of America, Larry G. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. MirandaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
  5. United States v. ErwingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API