Legal Opinion · Dissent

Butler v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1942Published

1Dissent

Callahan, J. (dissenting).

We hold that insured should have received credit for the cash payments made in connection with the “blue notes” in determining the amount of extended insurance available under the policies, otherwise they would conflict with the provisions of former section 88 (now § 208) of the Insurance Law. That section, in substance, states that if any insurance policy is lapsed for non-payment of any premium, or of any note given therefor, the reserves on said policy are to be applied to continue the insurance in force so long as said reserves will purchase temporary insurance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Inter-Southern Life Insurance Co. v. OmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Taylor v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Davis v. Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Talsky v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Hepner Marek v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API