Legal Opinion
Hepner Marek v. Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The question presented by this submission is whether on August 4, 1931, policies of life insurance issued by the defendant on which the plaintiffs were beneficiaries were in force and effect by virtue of a grace period. If so, a tender of past due premiums made on the date mentioned was timely and plaintiffs are entitled to recover. If not, judgment should be given for the defendant decreeing non-liability on the policies.
The two policies were issued by the defendant, each in the sum of $5,000 and covering the life of one Hepner, on November 3, 1919. A semi-annual premium on each policy fell…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holly v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Stewart v. Home Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Struhl v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Hand v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Butler v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Butler v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Jimenez v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023