Legal Opinion

Talsky v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

The parties submit this controversy for decision upon the following conceded state of facts: In October, 1928, the defendant reissued to the plaintiff its policy of life insurance, containing provisions for disability benefits, at a premium of $210.20 payable annually on June eighteenth. The premium which became due June 18, 1933, was not paid; but on July 18, 1933, within the thirty-day period of grace (Ins. Law, § 101), the plaintiff requested the defendant to extend the time of payment and for that purpose executed a note extension agreement, referred to in the submission as a “ blue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. New York Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Holly v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Nederland Life Insurance v. MeinertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Underwood v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Erickson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coons v. Home Life Insurance Co. New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Culley v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Butler v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Butler v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Jimenez v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API