Legal Opinion

Adams v. Bicknell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1890No. 14,650PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, C. J.

— This is an action for a malicious prosecution. The complaint alleges that in March, 1887, the appellee instituted before a justice of the peace a prosecution against the appellant, charging the appellant with having obstructed a public highway in Sullivan county, Indiana.

It appears from the averments of the complaint that the appellant was convicted before the justice of the peace, and he took an appeal to the circuit court, and was acquitted of the charge.

The complaint contains proper averments that the prosecution was malicious and without probable cause, but there are no averments that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bitting v. Ten EyckIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Paddock v. WattsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Inhabitants of Southbridge v. Inhabitants of CharltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hanser v. BieberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Cooper v. FlemmingTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Saunders v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  5. Nehr v. DobbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API