Burton v. City of Reidsville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarNHill, C. J.
This proceeding became so entangled in a snarl of procedure in the court below that no course is left open to us except to vacate the judgment entered and remand the cause for hearing in accord with the applicable principles of law.
As the record now stands, we have a judgment dismissing the action and, at the same time, affirmatively adjudicating the rights of the parties “if the pleadings and evidence present a question of fact for the Court.” But the court did not decide whether the pleadings and evidence present an issue of fact for a jury or a question of fact for the court. Thus we have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- In Re Housing Authority of City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Corcoran v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Morse v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Lewis v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Pharr v. GaribaldiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.