Legal Opinion

Shelly M. Phipps v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2018No. 28S05-1707-CR-499PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goff, Justice.

Protective orders have sweeping reach in our state. By their terms, these orders endeavor to establish a hedge of protection around one person by restricting the actions or words of another. Thousands of faceless Hoosiers are currently subject to or shielded by protective orders like the one at the center of this case. Because violating a protective order amounts to a criminal act, the State must prove a mens rea element-that the person intended to violate the order. This case presents the question of what constitutes sufficient evidence to prove a person intentionally or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Charles Stephenson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. William Clyde Gibson III v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Chad E. Adams v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Michael Norris v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Sebastian Durstock v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Jackie Harold Parsley, II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Adam R. McCarthy v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API