Legal Opinion
Anglemyer v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 2007No. 43S05-0606-CR-230PublishedCited by 1,261 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUCKER, Justice.
Summary
In this opinion we discuss the respective roles of Indiana trial and appellate courts under the 2005 amendments to Indiana’s criminal sentencing statutes. We hold that where a trial court imposes sentence for a felony offense it is required to issue a sentencing statement that includes a reasonably detailed recitation of the trial court’s reasons for the sentence imposed. The standard of review is abuse of discretion.
Facts and Procedural History
Around 10:00 p.m. on May 14, 2005, Alexander J. Anglemyer telephoned a local restaurant and ordered a pizza. He advised the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,261 opinions
- Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Curtis A. Bethea v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Iowa v. Mark Aaron ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
1,256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.