Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Neil

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Decided July 15, 1840PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[This was an action by Adam McKinney against William Neil to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an accident alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant.]

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The defendant, dn connection with others, is an extensive stage proprietor, and runs the lines of stages from Columbus to Zanesville, in this slate. The plaintiff being a passenger in one of these lines, through the negligence and want of skill of the driver, as he alleges, the stage was upset, and he was severely injured. For this injury, the loss of time and expense, this action was brought. It was proved that the plaintiff being in Columbus on the evening of the 18th December, 1838, took a seat for the next morning’s stage to Zanes-ville, at the stage office, and paid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. People v. SandsNew York Supreme Court · 1806

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Sherlock v. AllingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Frink v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Memphis & Ohio River Packet Co. v. McCoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Ficken v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API