Legal Opinion

Bourdon v. Vigil

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided January 21, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00588Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ANDY BOURDON, LAURA PORTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:24-cv-00588-DHU-JHR JOHN RAMON VIGIL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH ORDERS AND RULES Plaintiffs Andy Bourdon and Laura Porter are proceeding pro se in this case. Generally, pro se litigants are held to the same standards of professional responsibility as trained attorneys. It is a pro se litigant’s responsibility to become familiar with and to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API