Legal Opinion

Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. Minugh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1951No. 12327PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a rather complicated proceeding (20 pages of transcript, 121 pages of statement of facts, and 83 pages of briefs) to determine whether a truck-motorcycle collision case should be tried in Nueces County where the suit was filed and the collision occurred, or in Bexar County where the defendant resides.

The court below overruled defendant’s plea of privilege and, although not required to do so, the trial judge filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Rule 385, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. He found that the driver of defendant’s truck had committed both a crime…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Gulf Ins. Co. v. James, St. Treas.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Austin v. William Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gunter v. Texas Land and Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. English & Scottish-American Mortgage & Investment Co. v. HardyTexas Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Minugh v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Scott v. National Bankers Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Gorbett Bros. Welding Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Bellinger v. SchutteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API