Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The district judge was of the opinion that the jury had returned conflicting findings in this case and accordingly refused to render judgment but declared a mistrial. The relator, Rpyal Crown Bottling Company, the defendant below and hereinafter given that designation, has applied to this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district judge to render judgment upon the verdict. If there be no conflict in the findings, this Court may issue the writ under the provisions of Article 1824, Vernon’s Ann.Tex. Stats. • ■
The collision giving rise to this action occurred at an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Casualty Underwriters v. RhoneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. MinughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Fredericksburg Hospital & Clinic v. SpringallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minugh v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Polis v. FuchsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Houston Transit Co. v. FarrackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Swift & Company v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958