Meyers v. El Tejon Oil & Refining Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
On March 15, 1940, a dividend was declared upon defendant’s common stock at a special meeting of defendant’s board of directors attended by only four of its seven directors. No notice of the meeting was given to the directors as required by section 307a of the Civil Code, nor did the absent directors sign a waiver of notice or a consent to the meeting or an approval of its minutes as required by section 307b of the Civil Code. Plaintiff who was then vice-president of the corporation as well as one of its directors was present at the meeting. The dividend was paid in cash to all holders of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Pauly v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crellin's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Gray v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Stephenson v. DreverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Agran v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Crellin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.