People v. Arce
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUMES, J.
Defendant Christian Arce pleaded guilty to assault with a firearm. He appeals from a postjudgment order requiring him to pay restitution to compensate the victim for economic losses. 1 He contends that the order must be reversed because (1) the People waived their ability to seek such restitution; (2) the portion of the order compensating the victim for future lost wages lacks a rational basis; and (3) his trial counsel was ineffective by not seeking a discount of that portion of the order to account for its present-day value. We reject these claims and affirm.
I
' Factual and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. BenavidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. VinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. ProsserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Alvarez CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Connell CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Love CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Rodriguez CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Tibayan CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021