Legal Opinion

People v. Arce

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 2014No. A138376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUMES, J.

Defendant Christian Arce pleaded guilty to assault with a firearm. He appeals from a postjudgment order requiring him to pay restitution to compensate the victim for economic losses. 1 He contends that the order must be reversed because (1) the People waived their ability to seek such restitution; (2) the portion of the order compensating the victim for future lost wages lacks a rational basis; and (3) his trial counsel was ineffective by not seeking a discount of that portion of the order to account for its present-day value. We reject these claims and affirm.

I

' Factual and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. BenavidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. VinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. ProsserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Alvarez CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. People v. Connell CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. Love CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Rodriguez CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Tibayan CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API