Legal Opinion

United States v. Isadore Marion

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 7, 1976No. 794, Docket 75-1408PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:

To guard against the realization of Orwellian fears and conform to the constitutional standards for electronic surveillance operations elaborated in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) and Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41, 87 S.Ct. 1873, 18 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1967), Congress enacted Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. Title III imposes detailed and specific restrictions upon both the interception of wire and oral communications, and the subsequent use of the fruits of such…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. United States v. BascaroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Robert Vernon Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API