Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Courtney C. Beamon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2013No. 2010AP002003-CRPublished

1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 53. Gdissenting). The precipitating error at trial lies not in the wording of a jury instruction. Rather, the precipitating error at trial lies in the State's decision to request a jury instruction that contains a factual theory of prosecution for which there was no supporting evidence.

¶ 54. The majority compounds that error by treating a factual theory of prosecution as an element of the offense, thus concluding that the jury instruction is erroneous. It is not.

¶ 55. Week in and week out, courts throughout this state regularly give jury instructions that contain factual theories of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API