State v. Courtney C. Beamon
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 53. Gdissenting). The precipitating error at trial lies not in the wording of a jury instruction. Rather, the precipitating error at trial lies in the State's decision to request a jury instruction that contains a factual theory of prosecution for which there was no supporting evidence.
¶ 54. The majority compounds that error by treating a factual theory of prosecution as an element of the offense, thus concluding that the jury instruction is erroneous. It is not.
¶ 55. Week in and week out, courts throughout this state regularly give jury instructions that contain factual theories of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.