Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Schultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a separation, order granting plaintiff’s motion for an examination of the defendant before trial and requiring the production of certain books and records reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. (Galusha v. Galusha, 138 N. Y. 272, 281, 282; Van Valkenburgh v. Van Valkenburgh, 149 App. Div. 482, 484; Mendel v. Mendel, 230 id. 869.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Van Valkenburgh v. Van ValkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Levi v. LeviNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Scheffer v. SchefferNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Kirshner v. KirshnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Tavalin v. TavalinNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Miller v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1947