Legal Opinion

Scheffer v. Scheffer

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

The plaintiff’s motion is granted as to items “ 1” and “ 3 denied as to item “ 2 Books and records bearing upon the facts embraced in the items as to which examination has been granted will be produced and used in accordance with section 296 of the Civil Practice Act.

The court is of the opinion that the plaintiff has the right to take the defendant’s deposition in respect to his financial standing and earnings. This is so notwithstanding that such deposition is to be used at hearings before an official referee, to whom *345has been referred a motion by the plaintiff to punish the defendant for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Safrin v. SafrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Colonial Trust Co. v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Schultz v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Fitzpatrick v. FitzpatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rann v. RannNew York City Family Court · 1967
  2. Balmer v. BalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bristol-Myers Co. v. Bargain Town U. S. A., No. 2 Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Haber v. HaberNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Selkowitz v. SelkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API