Kirshner v. Kirshner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
This is an action for divorce. The parties were married in 1947 and have a 10-year-old daughter. Undenied by respondent are factual allegations in the complaint that he has been living with another woman from 1955 to the ‘1 present time Appellant, nevertheless, must satisfactorily prove adultery (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1150).
We have heretofore denied, as a matter of policy, examinations of husbands as to assets and income in matrimonial actions (Safrin v. Safrin, 205 App. Div. 628; Horsch v. Horsch, 206 App. Div. 710; Hutaff v. Hutaff, 208 App. Div. 745; Woods v. Woods, 228 App. Div. 842; Fried v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Van Valkenburgh v. Van ValkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Goshin v. GoshinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Safrin v. SafrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Jasne v. JasneNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Fried v. FriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Salomon v. SalomonNew York Supreme Court · 1979