Legal Opinion
Murdick v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1926No. 7417-7422PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENTON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in error (hereafter for convenience referred to as defendants) were tried in the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota upon an indictment charging in the first count a violation of that portion of section 194 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10364) reading as follows:
“Sec. 194. Whoever shall steal, take or abstract, or by fraud or deception obtain, from or out of any mail, post-office, or station thereof, or other authorized depository for mail matter, or from a letter or mail carrier, any letter, postal card, package, bag, or mail,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Chadwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- McGregor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Adrian J. Short, Jr. Earl L. RiedelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- Kastel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Gates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.