Legal Opinion
Kastel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 19, 1927No. 8PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating tho facts as above). Upon the plea of double jeopardy the defendant has the burden of proof, and must make out his case. Com. v. Wermouth, 174 Mass. 74, 54 N. E. 352; People v. Schepps, 231 Mich. 260, 203 N. W. 882; State v. Ackerman, 64 N. J. Law, 99, 45 A. 27; State v. Williams, 43 Wash. 505, 86 P. 847; Harlan v. State, 190 Ind. 322, 130 N. E. 413; Price v. State, 104 Miss. 288, 61 So. 314; Barber v. State, 151 Ala. 56, 43 So. 808; Territory v. West, 14 N. M. 546, 99 P. 343; State v. Freeman, 162 N. C. 594, 77 S. E. 780, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 977; Jacobs v. State, 100 Ark. 591,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Stabile v. . Warden, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- United States v. MorseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- McKinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Commonwealth v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Harlan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Inmon, Martel A/K/A MartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. TramaglinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.