Legal Opinion
United States v. American Medical Ass'n
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 31, 1939No. 63221PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCTOR, Justice.
The defendants have filed a motion which is countered by a motion of the government to strike. The former, interpreted in the light of supporting affidavit and argument, in effect seeks approval by the court for defendants or their counsel to elicit from persons, composing the late grand jury, which returned the indictment, information as to evidence and proceedings before it, and for examination of the transcript covering the same, with a view to discovering whether there was misconduct by government counsel or incompetent and irrelevant evidence which might be used by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. GarssonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- State v. FassetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- State v. HamlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- In re MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- United States v. Adrian J. Short, Jr. Earl L. RiedelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Carrado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- In Re Report & Recommendation of June 5, 1972 Grand Jury Concerning Transmission of Evidence to the House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.