Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Pool

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 27, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Fite. Whitfield superior court. October term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

When a horse in a city, town, or village is quietly grazing on an unused street between the railroad-track and a barbed-wire fence near by, in plain view of the employees of the railroad company having control of an approaching train, the company is liable to the owner of the animal for injuries it sustains in consequence of being frightened by the wanton, unnecessary, and unusual blowing of the locomotive whistle which causes the animal to become injured by running into the fence. There was evidence to sustain this theory of the plaintiff’s case,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morgan v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Wrightsville & Tennille RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. ParishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Chalkley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Chicago, R.I. P. R. Co. v. HineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API