Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Central Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 23, 1886PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Railroads. Damages. Negligence. New Trial. Before Judge Adams. Effingham Superior Court. November Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

Had this been the first grant of a new trial, it is conceded that there could have been no reason for interfering with the judgment ordering it because of any abuse of discretion on the part of the judge who presided in the case ; but inasmuch as it is the second verdict in favor of the plaintiff, it is contended that the court had no right to set it aside, upon the ground that it was decidedly and strongly against the weight of evidence, if there was any testimony, however slight, to authorize it. Had this assumption been true, the conclusion insisted on would have followed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Georgia Railroad v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. MarkensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Reid v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. LyleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Hill v. Rome Street RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API