Coleman v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Adams. City court of Dublin. June 7, 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
1. A railroad company is under no duty to a person unloading merchandise from a car on a side-track to a wagon, to which a horse is hitched, to comply with the requirements of the Civil Code, § 2224, respecting the giving of signals and checking the speed of the train before reaching a public crossing.
2. While under some circumstances a railroad company may be under a duty to warn a person, who is near its track by its permission, of the approach of a train, the failure to do so in the present case did not authorize a recovery, because it is manifest from the evidence that the omission to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hill v. Rome Street RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Southern Railway Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Douglas & Co. v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Reid v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. ParishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Gulf, M. N.R.R. Co. v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- Chalkley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.