Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Adams. City court of Dublin. June 7, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

1. A railroad company is under no duty to a person unloading merchandise from a car on a side-track to a wagon, to which a horse is hitched, to comply with the requirements of the Civil Code, § 2224, respecting the giving of signals and checking the speed of the train before reaching a public crossing.

2. While under some circumstances a railroad company may be under a duty to warn a person, who is near its track by its permission, of the approach of a train, the failure to do so in the present case did not authorize a recovery, because it is manifest from the evidence that the omission to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. Rome Street RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Douglas & Co. v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Reid v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. ParishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Gulf, M. N.R.R. Co. v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chalkley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API