Legal Opinion

Thornburgh v. Ben Hur Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1950No. 33761PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

The appeal before us arose out of the following facts and circumstances: Mac Thornburgh, plaintiff in error here, and another filed an action in the district court of Okmulgee county against Ben Hur Coal Company, a corporation, to cancel a coal mining lease covering certain lands in that county. The lease was dated April 30, 1929, and was for a primary term of 15 years and as much longer as coal was mined. On March 26, 1947, the court entered a judgment, the pertinent portion of which is as follows:

“It is therefore considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that unless within ninety (90) days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaskins v. MackSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Clonts v. SpurwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Carroll v. State Ex Rel. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Consumers' Oil & Refining Co. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Matyski v. BuczkowskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. MATTER OF ESTATE OF BURKHART v. WabaunseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Oklahoma Historical Society v. WabaunseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Stekoll v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API