Legal Opinion

Gaskins v. Mack

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 15, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

— In June, 1924, the appellant and her husband exhibited their bill in chancery against Peter Mack and twenty-five other persons and all unknown parties claiming an interest in certain lands described in the bill. The purpose of the bill was to effect a partition of the lands described.

It was alleged that Eudora O. Taylor died November 18, 1892, seized in fee simple of the lands described. That she was the mother of complainant and other minor children. That such children and the father of the complainant, who was the husband of Eudora, survived her. That the children of Eudora and her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. DaCosta v. DibbleSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HarbySupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Dorman v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Lonergan v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Manning v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. Loeb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API