Legal Opinion
Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Town of North Stonington
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 31, 1998No. 3:97 CV 2679(GLG)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, plaintiff Sprint Spectrum L.P., d/b/a Sprint PCS (“Sprint”) moves for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion (Document # 18) is DENIED without prejudice. 1
BACKGROUND
Sprint provides wireless personal communication services (“PCS”) and has been licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to disseminate its services throughout Connecticut. The FCC license mandates that within ten years, Sprint must provide its services to a certain percentage of the Connecticut population.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Town of LaGrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Roberts v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Borough of Ho-Ho-KusDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.