Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota, Department of Jobs and Training v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1989No. 87-5346PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This en banc submission follows an opinion of a panel of this court reported as *181State of Minnesota v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 858 F.2d 433 (8th Cir.1988). The appeal results from the district court’s determination that the Merit Systems Protection Board (the Board) abused its discretion by ordering the removal of Thomas J. Kehoe, upon finding that Kehoe willfully violated the Hatch Political Activity Act (Hatch Act), 5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508, by running for partisan political office while a state employee in a federally funded program. While agreeing with the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Johnson v. CushingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- State of Minnesota, Department of Jobs and Training v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by14 opinions
- Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Robert D. Alexander v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Molina-Crespo v. United States Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Crespo v. United States Merit Systems Protection BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.