Legal Opinion

Vance v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 25, 1990No. 1-89-0859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiff, Delores Vance, appeals from the entry of summary judgment under section 2—1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2—1005) in favor of defendant, the City of Chicago (city). We address the issue of whether the city owed a duty of care to plaintiff, who was injured when she fell in a pothole in the street after leaving a Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) bus. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Plaintiff filed a complaint against the city and the CTA and alleged that on October 5, 1984, she was injured in the street when she fell after stepping off a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Di Domenico v. Village of RomeovilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Deren v. City of CarbondaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Risner v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Ross v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Mason v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Curatola v. Village of NilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Torres v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Ramirez v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Wolowinski v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Vaughn v. City of West FrankfortAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API