Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 5, 1991No. 1-90-2347PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE RAKOWSKI

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff-appellant Juanita Ramirez filed this negligence action against defendant-appellant the City of Chicago (City) to recover damages plaintiff incurred while stepping onto a street. The trial court held that, pursuant to section 3 — 102(a) of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 85, par. 3—102(a)) (Tort Immunity Act), the City owed plaintiff no duty, and thus the trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals the entry of summary judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lance v. SeniorIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Greene v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Horrell v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Curatola v. Village of NilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sisk v. Williamson CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Torres v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Kavales v. City of BerwynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Grove v. City of Park RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API