Legal Opinion

Richins v. Deere & Co.

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided November 17, 2004No. CIV-03-0072 JB/LAMPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BROWNING, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for New Trial, filed May 4, 2004 (Doc. 162). The primary issue is whether the Plaintiffs, A.D. and Sue Riehins, and Sue Riehins as next friend of Arthur Dloyd Riehins, Jr., a minor, have met their burden of showing one of the alleged bases for their motion constituted an abuse of discretion or clear error that resulted in prejudice to a substantial right. For the reasons that the Court stated on the record at the July 14, 2004 hearing, and consistent with that oral ruling, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
  2. Pulawa v. GTE Hawaiian TelHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  4. Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  5. Pulawa v. GTE Hawaiian TelHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API