Legal Opinion

Romanus v. Biggs

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 17, 1949No. 16172PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This is a suit in equity brought by George Romanus as a member of a partnership doing business as Biggs Wholesale Liquors against the other alleged partners, D. F. Biggs, M. Stede Stackhouse and T. F. Murphy, for an accounting of the partnership affairs. The South Carolina National Bank was made a party defendant because it had on deposit some of the partnership funds and it was sought to restrain ¡ the bank from paying out these funds until the rights of the parties in the partnership assets could be determined. Ernest Biggs was also joined as a party defendant upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burdine v. Burdine's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Crosswell v. Connecticut Indemnity Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  3. Ex Parte RosenfeldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McNally v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Oxman v. ProfittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Osteen v. T.E. Cuttino Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. H. G. Hall Construction Co. v. J.E.P. EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Romanus v. BIGGSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API