Legal Opinion
A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided May 24, 1957No. C. D. 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on automobile tires at 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 216 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as articles, composed in part of carbon. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1537 (b) of said tariff act, as modified, as automobile tires, composed wholly or in chief value of rubber.
Six entries are involved in this protest covering various shipments of automobile tires from Canada in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cochrane v. Badische Anilin & Soda FabrikSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Larzelere & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Nat E. Berzen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Joseph Weiss Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seedman International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Christensen Diamond Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Engelhard Hanovia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.