Engelhard Hanovia, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richardson, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case consists of diamond particles, synthetically produced, ranging in size from that known as 60 mesh to that known as 170 mesh, exported from South Africa and entered for consumption at Newark, N. J. It was described on the invoice as “Rough and Uncut Diamonds, Diamond Powder, Synthetic Grit, 15,000 carats.” It was assessed with duty at 15 per centum ad valorem under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1001, paragraph 214 (paragraph 214, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified), as an earthy or mineral substance wholly or partly manufactured, not specially…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cochrane v. Badische Anilin & Soda FabrikSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Larzelere & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mullins Industrial Diamond Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965