Legal Opinion

Seedman International Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 13, 1968No. C.D. 3285PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beckworth, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, consists of inner tubes of various sizes, imported from Holland and West Germany and entered at the port of New York on various dates in 1962. They were designated on the invoices and entries as bicycle tubes and were assessed with duty at 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 371 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as parts of bicycles. Plaintiffs claim that they are not dedicated to use as bicycle tubes, but are dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 216 of said tariff act, as modified by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. F. A. Baker Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chain Bike Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Fabius & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API