Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 14, 1995No. 94-0494; CMR No. 9202700PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

WISS, Judge:

1. After a contested trial, a general court-martial convicted appellant of larceny, forgery, and larceny of mail matter (2 specifications each), in violation of Articles 121, 123, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921, 923, and 934, respectively. Therefor, the court-martial sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, a fine of $2,000.00, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved these results, and the Court of Military Review * affirmed without opinion.

2. On appellant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  3. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. ShackelfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. GriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. RuizCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API