Legal Opinion
United States v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 2017No. 17-72917PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WARDLAW and GOULD, Circuit Judges:
On September 5, 2017, the Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Elaine Duke, announced the end of DHS’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy (“DACA”), effective March 5, 2018. Begun in 2012, DACA provided deferred action for certain individuals without lawful immigration status who had entered the United States as children. Several sets of plaintiffs sued to enjoin the rescission of DACA under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and under various constitutional theories not relevant here.
The merits of those claims…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Blaine P. Thompson v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Crista Ramos v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In Re United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Nat'l Ass'n v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Casa De Md. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.