Legal Opinion

Saari v. Jongordon Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1992No. A051605PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

A jury found in favor of respondents Tyme Saari, Peggy Dowling and Patrick Hinrichsen on their action for damages against appellant Jongordon Corporation for breach of a contract to cremate the remains of Robert Saari. The complaint had also alleged causes of action for negligent and intentional emotional distress. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial were denied.

Jongordon appeals from the judgment and the order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict, contending that (1) Hinrichsen is not entitled to recover damages for emotional distress…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Chelini v. NieriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Conroy v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API