Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Fickert

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1921No. Civ. No. 3619. Civ. No. 3620PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEAWELL, P. J., pro tem.

These are appeals from judgments made and entered in favor of defendant in two separate actions brought by plaintiffs herein to recover upon two certain promissory notes.

Agreeably to stipulation of the parties an order of this court was heretofore made that both appeals be submitted upon the same briefs. The notes in each action are alike in amounts, identical in form and substance, except as to the time of payments and arise out of the same transaction and contract. Both were indorsed and sold to the respective assignees, plaintiffs herein, before maturity and for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Flood v. PetryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Langan v. LanganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Shiver v. Liberty Building-Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API