Department of Transportation v. Idol
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Lessor argues that because the terms of the lease are ambiguous, the trial court erred in determining the meaning of the contract as a matter of law and in granting lessees’ summary judgment motion. We disagree.
The lease provides in pertinent part:
That subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth lessor does hereby let and lease unto lessees and lessees do hereby accept as tenant of lessor a certain parcel of land, together with a storebuilding and certain equipment therein, in Guilford County, North Carolina, located on the southwest corner of the intersection of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cleland v. Children's Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Blue Jeans Corp. v. Pinkerton, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dockery v. Quality Plastic Custom Molding, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Simmons v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Southern Furniture Co. of Conover, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Goodwin v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.