Legal Opinion
Dews v. WALDERN
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 5, 2008No. Civil Action 08-1249 (RMC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Petitioner Ivory Dews petitions for a writ of habeas corpus [Dkt. No. 1], claiming that he is serving an expired sentence. Respondent United States Parole Commission (“Parole Commission”) counters that Mr. Dews has not accounted for the forfeiture of credit for time spent on parole (“street-time credit”) each of the eight times that his parole has been revoked. See United States Parole Commission’s Opposition to Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. No. 9] at I. Because, as discussed below, District of Columbia law…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Fleming v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Michael Ellis, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Roosevelt Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Herndon v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- A. Sharpe v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Rious v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.