Legal Opinion

Shofstall v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 8, 1978No. 74 C 2067PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUA, District Judge.

ORDER

This cause comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., on the issue of the defendants’ liability under: 1) Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (1977)); and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1977)); 2) Sections 214 and 20a(11) of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1920 (49 U.S.C. §§ 314, 20a(11) (1978)), and; 3) Section 12 of the Illinois Securities Law of 1953 (Ill.Rev.Stat., ch. 121%, § 137.-12 (1978)). The defendant Price Water-house & Co. (hereafter…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. First Fla. Bank, NA v. Max Mitchell & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Brumley v. Touche Ross & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Idaho Bank & Trust Co. v. First Bancorp of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Gillespie v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API