Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. Seymour
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided May 4, 1990No. 63,791PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
Warren Brown Gillespie and Polly Gillespie Townsend (Beneficiaries) appeal from a district court order granting Robert W. Burdge’s and Grant-Thornton’s (Accountants) motion to dismiss pursuant to K.S.A. 60-212(b)(6). The court concluded K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 1-402 and the common law embodied in the Kansas cases requires dismissal of the Beneficiaries’ claims against the Accountants. We affirm the district court in dismissing all stated causes of action against the Accountants; but we find that the allegations, if taken as true for purposes of the motion to dismiss, and drawing all inferences…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ling v. Jan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Haddon View Investment Co. v. CoopersOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Moore v. State Bank of BurdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Eric C. Rajala, Trustee in Bankruptcy for General Poly Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Allied Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Murphy v. WakeleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.