Legal Opinion

People v. Cramley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1913No. Crim. No. 298PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Prank G. Pinlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Defendant was charged with having, on the twenty-third day of November, 1912, killed and murdered one Joseph W. Pear. Upon trial being had he was found guilty of the crime of manslaughter. Thereafter a motion for a new trial was made and denied, and judgment followed. This appeal was then taken from the order denying the motion for a new trial and from the judgment.

On the day of the alleged homicide deceased was visiting at the house of one Nellie Greaney at Pasadena. Mrs. Greaney occupied apartments consisting of three rooms. The wife of deceased, during the absence of her husband, had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People v. MuhlnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. ShearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People v. CasselmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. BoyleNevada Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. EmmettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API