People v. Casselman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge rendering judgment and order; B. N. Smith, Judge acting at trial and instructing jury. Other judges acted as stated in the opinion of the court, which also states further facts in the case.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Upon trial in the superior court of Los Angeles county the defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery. She prosecutes this appeal from the judgment rendered upon such conviction, and also from an order of court denying her motion for a new trial.
The forged document was a check purporting to be drawn upon, and by the defendant presented for payment to, the First National Bank of Los Angeles. The trial commenced on April 16, 1908, before the late Hon. B. N. Smith presiding as judge. On April 18, 1908, Hon. Walter Bordwell, presiding as judge, the trial of the case was by consent of all…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. OliveriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. BrothertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Cadenasso v. AntonelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Berger v. BergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Journigan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.