People v. Huntington
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Robert Ferral, Daniel J. Murphy, Thomas D. Riordan, and P. F. Dunne, for Appellant. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, A. A. Moore, Jr., Deputy Attorney-General, and U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, George A. Sturtevant, Deputy Attorney-General, and E. B. Power, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The information charged defendant with murder, and the jury returned a verdict of manslaughter, upon which judgment was rendered, sentencing him to ten years’ imprisonment in the state prison. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Appellant contends that the following instruction was erroneous: “ ‘Moral certainty’ is that degree of proof which the law requires of moral evidence. ‘Moral certainty’ is described as a state of impression produced by facts in which a reasonable mind feels a sort of coercion or necessity to act in accordance with it.” In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. VereneseneckockockhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. BalkwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.