Furgerson v. Twisdale.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Actioh by II. B. Furgerson against James II. Twisclale and J. IT. Eenner, beard before Judge James L. Webb at November Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Halifax County. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant Fenner appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action is brought to recover possession of a lot of peanuts and corn. The facts are embodied in a statement of “agreed facts/’ the substance of which is as follows: The two defendants cultivated the crop together on the W. E. Fenner plantation during the year 1903. Dur ing the same year the defendant J. H. Fenner individually cultivated a crop on another part of the same plantation, in which Twisdale had no interest. The defendants needed guano for their “copartnership crop” and purchased it from the plaintiff and used it exclusively on the Twisdale .crop. Fenner used none of it for his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas Roberts & Co. v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- H. B. Taliaferro & Co. v. W. A. Sater & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank of Washington v. HainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Mott v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Clowney v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Millard v. . SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917