Legal Opinion

Mott v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1920No. 15774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Taylor, J., entered July 26, 1919, in favor of the intervener, adjudging the priority of a chattel mortgage lien, tried to the court upon stipulated facts.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

On December 19, 1918, the defendant, H. M. Johnson, purchased a pool room and cigar store in the town of Granger, for the agreed price of $1,750, paying nothing down, but giving his note for the full purchase price, and securing the same by a duly executed chattel mortgage in which the property pledged is described as follows:

“All the furniture and fixtures contained in the building known as the Fred R. Hawn building and located on the east 25 feet of lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, in block 22, Town of Granger, Washington, together with all merchandise therein contained and more especially described…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willey v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Furgerson v. Twisdale.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Harding v. CoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1847

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mogan v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Goddard v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Community State Bank v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Robson v. MaloneyWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API